Cover art by Cully Hamner

The Question #37
Script: Dennis O’Neil, Greg Rucka
Pencils: Denys Cowan
Inks: Bill Sienkiewicz, John Stanisci
Colors: David Baron
DC Comics
February 3, 2010

*Spoiler Alert*

Do you want the good news or the bad news first?  Well, I’m just going to rip the figurative Band-Aid off this bitch: The art sucked. Let me be clear; I usually marvel at the talent of the folks who draw, ink, and color these funny books I heart so much — but I did not enjoy the visuals in this issue like at all. It seemed intentionally overdone. Too much pencil. Too much ink. It was  reminiscent of the Final Crisis: Rogues’ Revenge miniseries. (I heard it was good, but I didn’t read it because the art irritated me so.)  The panels lacked any real definition or fluidity, and most of the images were stiff silhouettes. As someone who appreciates the female form, I’ma need ya to do better — especially in a story featuring my two favorite DC women.  There was barely any difference between Shiva’s face and Renee’s face, despite the fact that they are of different ethnic backgrounds. Clothes and length of hair were the only defining qualities. That aside, the fight scenes were well-communicated, and a few panels somehow managed to transcend the overall stiffness.  Now, on to the juice:

The issue opens with a montage of monuments and memories of Charles Victor Szasz.  Cut to Renee and Tot discussing the dead rising. Tot, the scientist, is enthralled by an experiment related to the Black Lanterns when Renee hears something. Enter my favorite sociopath. (Heart leaps with joy; people in restaurant have no idea why I have such a stupid smile on my face.) My hope is requited, and Rucka and O’Neil delivered. Lady Shiva’s entrance was flawless.

Now let’s get down to some martial arts, which is really the crux of this issue. We get to see the Renee/Shiva mashup. Renee reluctantly puts up a good fight, to which Shiva responds, “Adequate. Good. This will not be as boring as I feared.” Cue Renee, who responds, “Lady, you are ten pounds of crazy in a five-pound bag.” HA! I loved that damn line.

During their duel/dance, Tot was busy with his science experiment, which, as far as I could tell, was concocting a Black Lantern ring all on his own. That led to the explosive arrival of Back Lantern Charlie, and just in time to distract Shiva from delivering her kill blow. It seems the nutbar really wanted to face the Black Lantern all along. You know, just ’cause. As BL Charlie looks upon Renee and Shiva, we see their true colors: Indigo and green, respectively. Perfect.

A well-informed Shiva schools Renee that, “Not every battle ends with defeat of the enemy.” She then meditates herself into an emotion-free state, making her invisible to the Black Lantern. Pardon me while I log on to Lady Shiva is like a masochistic (and way hotter) Yoda with proper syntax.

Finally, Renee and Tot follow Shiva’s lead by letting go of their emotions for their dead loved one, thus becoming invisible. The Black Lantern takes off. Renee dons her costume, determined to follow the monster and stop it — which means we’ll be seeing more of her in this event. Works for me.

Overall, The Question #37 was an effing good read.  Lady Shiva was treated properly, and the story was exciting. It was not what I expected, but the story was perfect for its characters. If you have even the tiniest bit of interest in Charlie, Renee, Tot or Shiva, it’s definitely worth your $2.99.

2 thoughts on “G3 Review: The Question #37

  1. I’m going to take it that you have never actually looked at the original Denny O’ Neil Question comic books. I guess you like the new Question, but not enough to look into the guy who wore the mask before she did. That’s a shame, those books were amazing, they were truly the stuff of magic. Even the letters page was worth the price of the entire comic just for the book reading suggestions that were made along the way of the initial run. The art that you were condemning because it was not up to your standards, the core of that art was the pencils of Denys Cowan. Same artist whose own unique style was the “look” of the Question for the majority of O’ Neils run. The reason that the art looked the way it did was because DC was trying to invoke those old Denny O’ Neil Question books that stopped at issue #36, hence the one you read being #37. Just from glancing at the people that worked on #37 I remember Denny O’ Neil the original writer. Denys Cowan, who was the original penciler, and Bill Seinkiewicz who I think did some of the inks back then, but I know he did several of the covers. I guess that’s the difference between old Vic Sage Question fans and the newer fans that like the Renee Montoya version. If it doesn’t have a pretty face, no matter how good the story is, you ain’t buying it…

    …Your loss.


    1. You assume…a lot.

      I am familiar with the Vic Sage Question, and the art. I’ve also been reading the various DC titles “back from the dead” featuring their original writers and artists, so I get that concept too. I am also clear on how comic books are numbered, and that 37 follows the number 36.

      Different things appeal to different people. My opinion of the art is simply a matter of preference. What I find aesthetically pleasing…or displeasing is not necessarily a reflection on the talent of the artist. On my best day, I only wish I could draw like that.

      I do like Renee. I do like pretty faces. Sue me.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.